|
Leonard Wass
|
 |
« on: May 29, 2009, 12:36:47 PM » |
|
Aside from the fact that it's highly unbelievable (and even unreasonable) that a bunch of cave dwelling "terrorists" could possibly pull of an attack such as what happened on 9/11, and not dwelling on the fact that when the two Trade Center buildings fell, they fell exactly like a controlled demolition (complete with explosions and all), or that building seven imploded in on itself and hit the ground after a freefall, or that the very day of the "attack" the corporate media knew exactly who did it, posted all their pictures on TV and stated that Osama Bin Laden was responsible, and I could keep typing for another ten minutes about inconsistencies -- lets take a look at some factual evidence which supports that the official 9/11 story (that kept changing) is a total crock!
There's no shortage of engineers and architects who claim that those steel buildings could never have fallen without the help of explosive devices. Controlled demolition "experts" from around the world have stated that in their professional opinion, both towers and building seven were taken down by a controlled demolition.
Then there are questions. Why was the Saudi royal family allowed to fly out of the United States during a time where air traffic was restricted and no planes were allowed to fly? When George W. Bush was told about the "second" plane hitting the World Trade Center (while he was reading a book about a goat to school children), why wasn't he loaded into a car and protected by the secret service? Even if two buildings being attacked wasn't a good enough reason to be whisked off into protection, surely he could have put the book down?
I'll tell you why those "hijackers" were put on TV so quick. It's because the New World Order had a plan. They needed an horrific disaster such as 9/11 which would make people both angry and afraid. As always, evil dictators need a "bad guy" to protect the people from -- so they promptly filled the news reports with pictures of middle eastern looking men and labeled them as "terrorists". It's unfortunate that many people of middle eastern appearance were attacked, abused and even murdered because of these lies.
If the U.S. government was so privy to information, and were able to get photos of the "hijackers" and pin the attack on Bin Laden so quickly, then why didn't they know anything about it earlier? Were they withholding information? Did you know that Bin Laden and Al-Qaida were actually created by the CIA? Do you think that's ironic?
There are so many inconsistencies and unanswered questions about 9/11 that I couldn't possibly write all about it here in one thread. So what I suggest you do is take what I have written here as food for thought, and go research 9/11 truth. You will find many professionals who are utterly skeptical of the official story. You will find inconsistencies.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|